persevered until he had all of the facts before making a decision. 12 Angry Men was one of the most critically acclaimed movies of its time, even gaining several Oscar nominations.
persevered until he had all of the facts before making a decision. 12 Angry Men was one of the most critically acclaimed movies of its time, even gaining several Oscar nominations.Tags: Any Research ProposalDo You Spell Out Numbers In Research PapersWrite A Good Application EssayThesis Affiliate SkinDepression Argumentative EssaySpatial Statistics Phd ThesisWriting Paper For LettersAn Essay On The Principle Of Population 1798 Summary
For one example, in the story the foreman did not seem like he was in control at all and throughout the movie he was in more control.
There were a lot of arguments and confrontations among the jurors during deliberation and the man that broke it up and calmed everyone down was the foreman.
Each character also represents values and personal growth that we already have or hope to achieve.
There were jurors that represented trustworthiness. Juror #8 stood by his beliefs of reasonable doubt and innocence of the defendant.
Juror 8 is convinced that the prosecution's been building a faulty case and that everything is not as it seems, but he's finding it hard to get the other jurors to listen. passionate, intelligent, and deeply committed to justice.
A brilliant logician and rhetorician, Juror 8 might have strong feelings about the case, but he always has rational justifications for his emotions toward the supposed facts of the case.Twelve jurors have individual stands and differences that may have been affected by their experiences and upbringing.Every person in the movie represents current ethical and moral dilemmas that plague even individuals of today.There were only a few differences between the story and the movie.In conclusion, I think that both the story and the movie were both very interesting because there were several similarities, but there were differences between the two of them.The jurors’ votes are the same in the book and the movie.The first, second, third, and fourth vote remain the same throughout both of them.Lastly, all of these jurors demonstrated citizenship by serving the country in becoming jurors for this trial.Even Juror #2 was quite excited to be a member of the jury and be a part in the legal and judicial system.The movie tugged into strings that in the course of watching the movie, or even after, continuously made me think.How will one person convince eleven other jurors of reasonable doubt and change their votes from guilty to not guilty?