This section should be rich in references to similar work and background needed to interpret results.
However, interpretation/discussion section(s) are often too long and verbose.
Is there material that does not contribute to one of the elements listed above?
If so, this may be material that you will want to consider deleting or moving.
The list should include a short title for each figure but not the whole caption. The list should include a short title for each table but not the whole caption.
You can't write a good introduction until you know what the body of the paper says.If at all possible, start your thesis research during the summer between your junior and senior year - or even earlier - with an internship, etc. then work on filling in background material and lab work during the fall so that you're prepared to write and present your research during the spring .The best strategy is to pick a project that you are interested in, but also that a faculty member or other professional is working on.Your approach/methods should be carefully designed to come to closure.Your results should be clearly defined and discussed in the context of your topic. You should place your analysis in a broader context, and highlight the implications (regional, global, etc.) of your work.You should then go on to explain why more work was necessary (your work, of course.) Quarantine your observations from your interpretations.The writer must make it crystal clear to the reader which statements are observation and which are interpretation.Assess whether: How does one fairly and accurately indicate who has made what contributions towards the results and interpretations presented in your paper?: by referencing, authorship, and acknowledgements. Different types of errors: Check references carefully and reread reference works prior to publication.Consider writing the introductory section(s) after you have completed the rest of the paper, rather than before.Be sure to include a hook at the beginning of the introduction.